The Scheme of Assessment The scheme of assessment for the Advanced Subsidiary qualification is based on two examination papers. Paper 1 is presented in three sections and there are two essay-type questions in each section. Candidates are required to answer two questions, chosen from different sections, and the examination is of 1 hour 30 minutes duration.
Paper 2 consists of three structured data response questions. Candidates are required to answer two questions and the examination is of 1 hour 30 minutes duration. The marks for each AS paper will be divided between three assessment objectives: Success in the examination will depend heavily on the ability of the candidate to demonstrate the skills identified in the three assessment objectives.
An effective teaching strategy will therefore include provision for teaching and supporting the development of these skills among the candidates individually and as a study group. Teachers and Centres will identify their own schemes of best practice to suit their particular circumstances and candidate requirements. The following recommendations are intended as a modest contribution to the process of formulating an appropriate teaching strategy that each Centre will approach in its own way, and they are not necessarily the only or most effective way of helping candidates to achieve success in the examination.
Papers 1 and 2 are combined with a further written paper, Paper 3, to complete the scheme of assessment for the Advanced Level qualification.
Paper 3 is presented in six sections and there are two questions in each section. Each question has a part a and a part b. The part a questions ask the candidate to describe or explain the meaning of a key concept or theory. Answers should be illustrated with the use of examples. The part b questions are intended to be more demanding and carry a higher mark weighting accordingly.
These are essentially essay-type questions. As some of the knowledge content required to answer part b of a question may have already been covered in responding to part a , it is quite acceptable for the candidate to make cross-references to part a rather than repeating the same material. There is a clear demarcation between part a and part b questions on this paper. The style of response required of candidates is still essay-format but questions have been constructed in such a way as to make it easier for candidates to use their knowledge appropriately.
Part a of the question requires candidates to focus on knowledge and understanding and to demonstrate that they have interpreted the question correctly. They need also to support their knowledge with the appropriate application of the work of key thinkers, empirical data and relevant examples from studies. Work from an outline. Making an outline breaks the task down into smaller bits which do not seem as daunting. This allows you to keep an image of the whole in mind even while you work on the parts.
You can show the outline to your professor and get advice while you are writing a paper rather than after you turn it in for a final grade. Stick to the point. Each paper should contain one key idea which you can state in a sentence or paragraph. The paper will provide the argument and evidence to support that point. Papers should be compact with a strong thesis and a clear line of argument. Avoid digressions and padding. Make more than one draft. First drafts are plagued with confusion, bad writing, omissions, and other errors.
So are second drafts, but not to the same extent. Get someone else to read it. Even your roommate who has never had a sociology course may be able to point out unclear parts or mistakes you have missed. The best papers have been rewritten, in part or in whole, several times.
Few first draft papers will receive high grades. Proofread the final copy, correcting any typographical errors. It had a big hint of garlic in it.
I did like the food but not that much that I would just go and eat it on any day. The face that I had liked the food was very surprising to me because that I am so picky. This assignment has opened me up some more that I will consider different things and not just be so ethnocentric. They way that meals are prepared and cooked are different not the food they are made with. The biggest impact on my life was the way that I think about different cultures.
These different cultures come to America to change their lives but still have to keep their self-identity and they find that within their culture. The personality and identity is within their culture and not just the life they are trying to life.
I used to just think that if people want to come to America then they should just live the life we have here; but now that I have been in this class and assignment I see it a lot differently. I can honestly say that my Social Imagination has changed with this assignment.
Causality had a factor in this as well. When one simple idea in my mind changed it started to mold the others that I had already had in my head about the different culture. This assignment could very well be a deductive approach to culture. Before we get to know anything about a culture we have pre deceived ideas about them and then as we get to know the culture the ideas begin to get changed or analyzed.
There was a few people but they were either nurses or doctors seeming to be on their dinner break from the hospital. The culture analysis I was able to receive was a very small Sample; the employees were of the culture of the restaurant. The Material Culture was the hardest for me to figure out. From the way the restaurant was laid out I do believe it was art from their culture.
The last observation I was able to make was the Gender roles. I observed that the males were in the kitchen cooking and making the decisions. The women were the ones taking the orders and doing the smaller roles such as cleaning, organizing, and serving. Healthy eating means having the right amount of nutrients and minerals which help to give us energy and keep us healthy.
In order to get nutrients, we need to have a balanced diet which contains the adequate amount of nutrients from different food groups.
These nutrients include protein, carbohydrates, fat, water, vitamins, and minerals etc. The five main food groups of balanced diet are
Sociology observation paper essaysIn the town of Merrick, there is a little mall with a strip of about 15 stores. On the corner of the mall is where Milos is located. The best pizza and Italian food I had ever tasted came from here ever since I was a young kid.
Feb 09, · To Sociology C. DiBartolo Feb. 9, “Advantages vs Disadvantages to Henslin’s Research” Henslin used the method of participant observation to conduct his .
SOCIOLOGY OBSERVATION OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND REACTIONS Abstract The purpose of this essay is to outline and observe human behavior in a normal social setting. The setting of choice is located in Ansbach, Germany and is equal to the American version of a mall. The present observation paper sample will describe the situation when the writer provokes an unpleasant situation to a crowd of people and discuss the reaction and resolution to the conflict.
Free Essay: “Observation at Local Fast Food Restaurant During Lunch” Author: XXXXX XXXXX XXX University Introduction to Sociology “Observation at Local Fast. Mark Scheme for Participant Observation Essay (adapted from the AQA’s mark scheme for the same essay, AS sociology paper). The above essay should get .